feat(bootstrap): shared docker provider + foundation-net precursor (ADR-006)

Composition substrate for Wave 2 (T03+):
- lib/context.ts: one Docker-over-SSH provider + DeployCtx threaded to component
  factories; FOUNDATION_DOCKER_HOST override for ephemeral validation.
- lib/versions.ts: resolve pinned images from VERSIONS; FOUNDATION_ALLOW_UNPINNED
  for local validation when digests are still PIN_DIGEST.
- components/network.ts: foundation-net (CONTRACT_003 §3.1).
- index.ts: phase-orchestration entrypoint with dependsOn gates; Wave-2 slots.
- ADR-006: shared-provider + per-component-factory model (egg does not route its
  phased bootstrap through the monolithic vendored DockerDeployments).

Validated: pulumi up over Docker-over-SSH created+verified+destroyed foundation-net
on crunchy01 (x86_64); ephemeral, nothing persisted. tsc + preview clean.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Andreas Niemann 2026-06-30 18:18:40 +02:00
parent 57c4eadea7
commit 6a29db386f
8 changed files with 287 additions and 32 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
# ADR-006 — Bootstrap Composition Model: Shared Provider + Per-Component Factories
**Date**: 2026-06-30
**Status**: Accepted
## Context
The vendored `@olsitec/pulumi-docker` `DockerDeployments` class (T02) is **monolithic**: its
constructor takes the full provider map + a flat list of all containers and creates them together,
with no mechanism for ordering between containers beyond the network. The foundation bootstrap,
however, needs **phase gates** (PLAN-002 §2/§5): Vault must be `operator init`'d and unsealed
*between* the data-plane and Forgejo consuming its secrets, and Forgejo must be healthy *before*
runner registration/handover. Expressing those gates through the monolithic wrapper is awkward
(it would create the provider/network multiple times and cannot interleave an imperative init step).
## Decision
The bootstrap creates the **shared `docker.Provider` and `foundation-net` once** (`bootstrap/lib/context.ts`,
`bootstrap/components/network.ts`), and each service is a **pure factory** in
`bootstrap/components/<svc>.ts` with signature `(ctx: DeployCtx) => <outputs>` that creates its own
`docker.Container`(s) against the shared provider/network. `bootstrap/index.ts` is the single
composition point; **phase gates are Pulumi `dependsOn` edges**, not imperative sequencing, so
`pulumi up` derives the order.
The vendored `DockerDeployments` is **retained** as the published `@olsitec/pulumi-docker` API for
simple *downstream* (Layer-1) use — deploying a flat list of containers — but the egg does **not**
route its phased bootstrap through it.
Validation override: `FOUNDATION_DOCKER_HOST=ssh://user@host` points the provider at a dev Docker
host without editing committed config; `FOUNDATION_ALLOW_UNPINNED=1` lets `VERSIONS` PIN_DIGEST
placeholders fall back to tags for local validation only.
## Consequences
**Easier**:
- Phase gates (Vault init, Forgejo-before-handover) are natural dependency edges.
- One file per service, each independently ownable by a Wave-2+ agent (clean parallelism).
- Validated end-to-end: `pulumi up` over Docker-over-SSH created `foundation-net` on crunchy01
(172.30.0.0/24, attachable) and `destroy` removed it cleanly (2026-06-30).
**Harder**:
- More explicit plumbing than the one-call wrapper (a shared `ctx` threaded through factories).
- Two composition styles coexist (egg = direct; downstream = `DockerDeployments`) — documented here
to avoid confusion.
## Alternatives Considered
- **Route the whole bootstrap through `DockerDeployments`**: rejected — cannot express phase gates
or the imperative Vault-init step without recreating the provider/network per call.
- **Modify the vendored module to support phases**: rejected — it must stay a faithful Stage-1 vendor
(ADR-005) and remain useful as the simple downstream API; forking its behaviour now splits it.
## Confidence
**High** — the model is implemented and the Docker-over-SSH path is proven against a real x86_64
host (crunchy01). Companion: CONTRACT_003, PLAN-002 §5.